These checklists are designed to help authors ensure that their protocols, reviews, or review updates are completed to an acceptable standard for editorial and peer review. Authors are requested to use these checklists before completing the protocol or review.
The completed checklist must accompany the submitted protocol/review.
Developing logic models
At the CIDG, we recommend logic models for most of our reviews. They help clarify the background, outcomes, and structuring of the findings. In this document we provide guidance and example of their use. If you have new examples or any comments, please don't hesitate to get in touch.
This guide (PDF) explains the methods used to prepare the search strategy for your Cochrane Review and also how to complete your PRISMA flow chart.
References can be imported into Review Manager from EndNote libraries. Instructions for this are given in the following PDF.
The following information may also be of use to you if your review contains studies which are still ongoing or, although completed, have not yet been in a journal.
CIDG data collection and analysis content checklist
The CIDG has devised this checklist to help review authors prepare the ‘Data collection and analysis’ section. This checklist should be used alongside the CIDG pre-submission checklists for the protocol and review; however, it is not mandatory to submit the completed version of this methods content checklist. This checklist and guide does not take the place of the Cochrane Handbook, which provides a comprehensive guide to analysis.
'Summary of findings' guidance
All CIDG reviews are expected to include 'Summary of findings' tables. These are designed to summarize the key results of a specific question within a Cochrane review, and allow guidance to be issued on the basis of this. To assist with this process, special software has been developed, known as GRADEproGDT. Detailed information regarding 'Summary of findings' tables and GRADE can be accessed via the Cochrane Informatics and Knowledge Management Department (http://tech.cochrane.org/revman/gradepro) or via the GRADEproGDT website (http://www.guidelinedevelopment.org).
Plain language summary guidance
All Cochrane reviews must now have a plain language summary (PLS). The PLS aims to summarize the review in a style that can be understood by non-specialists.
PLSs are made freely available on the internet at http://summaries.cochrane.org/, the Cochrane Library website from Wiley, and on other websites affiliated with Cochrane, so they will often be read as stand-alone documents. PLSs are now also available at PubMed Health http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/.
As an author, you may need some help and guidance about writing a PLS. Cochrane Norway has devised a PLS introductory guide and a PLS checklist, and has kindly allowed us to share these resources here:
- How to write a plain language summary of a Cochrane intervention review (PDF)
- Checklist for plain language summaries of Cochrane intervention reviews (PDF)
How to submit a protocol or review for editorial review
Authors submit (“check in”) the protocol/review online using Archie, RevMan, or both. Authors also need to email the completed protocol or review checklist to the Managing Editor to complete this process. The Managing Editor will email all authors to confirm receipt of protocol/review and the checklist.
Email lists and newsletters
Cochrane uses e-mail discussion lists and newsletters as important means of communication. We encourage authors to ensure they are listed within the correct email lists and to sign up for the relevant newsletters.